New approach to traumatic brain injuries
news.harvard.edu
news.harvard.edu
We know that cell-cell adhesion molecules are part of larger complexes that are hugely important in cellular processes from promoting inflammation to cancer suppression (or, in its disregulation, metastasis http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epithelial-mesenchymal_transiti... ).
If the hypothesis--that blast injury has an important biological component--is true, then we're dealing with a biological basis for neurological disease after blast, instead of just a purely mechanical basis for disease. Unlike purely mechanical disruption, the biological part of the injury is potentially amenable to therapeutic intervention; and that's just what they've trialed with their ROCK inhibitor. I believe that's from paper #1.
This same inhibitor appears to ameliorate the blast-related sequelae on the cerebral vascular system as well, which I believe is from paper #2.
This is my interpretation based on the Gazette article, but I haven't yet read the papers themselves.
1. Paper #1 http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi/10.1371/journal.po...
2. Paper #2 http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2011/07/12/1105860108.abst...
Maybe a sound or frequency generator might work too.
Alternatively, we could stop messing around in countries where we have no business being, and treat traumatic brain injury by avoiding creating them in the first place.