> They are homeless for six weeks or fewer; 40 percent have a job.
Huh. So whenever a city pats itself on it's back for how many people it has homed, it's very likely the majority were people who were going to get back on their feet anyway.
Huh. So whenever a city pats itself on it's back for how many people it has homed, it's very likely the majority were people who were going to get back on their feet anyway.
Seems like a valid point despite the positive result. At the least, a consistent measure should be used when comparing statistics between cities.
It's a "valid point" as far as you're talking about numbers not people but I don't think you should feel so comfortable only going that far.