I do not get what sort of message one should get from a isolated statement of fact such as this one? In the real world we are presented only with trade-offs. There is no solution to reality. Any action (public policy or along any chain thereof) without a trade-off discussion of implications is a sign of immaturity or corruption. My comment has nothing to do whether one agrees or disagrees with proposed actions, Im simply observing the infantilization of a discussion in its form and content on a such a complex issue.

One cannot collapse such an issue into 0-D point and formulate policies, even less so theories, on a subject that impacts, and at the same time spans multiple spaces over which civilization exists as a whole.