Hacker News Reader

Comment by bsder | Hacker News Reader

> There is incredible potential wasted in large parts of the UK.

Except that those parts are the ones who benefited most from being in the EU and are also the parts that overwhelmingly voted for Brexit.

View on HN

All corners of the media fed them decades of lies about how it was the EU that was holding them back, and not the british ruling class.

How are they benefitting from cheap labor and goods coming over from Eastern Europe? That sounds like something London benefits from.

IIRC, the poorer parts of the UK are where the car factories are, and they used to export a lot — might still do, but the investment in that sector is down due to Brexit, and that's because the cheap imports included parts for manufacturing cars.

As for labor, again IIRC, the (fruit?) farms are labor intensive and locals aren't interested, at least not at the wages that the farms can afford given what they get paid by the supermarkets, who can't meaningfully pay more without raising prices, which they can't do without hurting more people: even before I left, I was seeing "donate food to the food bank" baskets at the doors to supermarkets in well-off areas like Cambridge.

Because cheap labour from the EU, an area of the world generally richer than the UK minus London, was mostly a marginal phenomenon that didn’t have an impact on the lives of the British workers. EU citizens earn more than the locals and are generally younger and better educated, so they finance public services without actually using them as much as the locals.

The entire UK depends on fiscal transfers from London, which is the only part of the country that is fully developed. So what benefits London, benefits the job center material complaining about foreigners in the barbaricum (which is the UK minus London).

> So what benefits London, benefits the job center material complaining about foreigners in the barbaricum (which is the UK minus London)

Gee, I wonder why those folks don’t believe Londoners who say they have their best interests at heart.

Because the flow of fiscal transfers never stopped. Turn London in an independent state that keeps all its tax income and see how long it takes to Brexit England to realise where the benefits have been coming from.

Or the hinterland could pull a Hunger Games: https://thehungergames.fandom.com/wiki/The_Capitol. God knows London of all places would have it coming.

At which point everything collapses--not just London. And what does the rest of the British isles have that the EU or US can't get elsewhere, better? And you would be relying on "modern norms" to protect you against someone invading the isles, exterminating everybody and taking over.

This is something people don't seem to get--anarchy sounds nice to lots of people. However, everything doesn't just keep going--everything suddenly stops.

Maybe what emerges on the other side on anarchy is better for "the people" (history suggests that the probabilities are against it), but there's a lot of bloodshed and starvation in the meantime.

You may get your pound of flesh but will you be alive to appreciate that fact?

Which is, in some sense, what happened with Brexit. And the result is that the average Briton is poorer than 6 years ago, while London is kind of holding, but for how long we don’t know.

It's a bizarre situation, they'd actually probably be better off voting to leave the UK and rejoining the EU.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com