That sucks. I don't believe in free energy, but I'd love to be proven wrong.
That sucks. I don't believe in free energy, but I'd love to be proven wrong.
It is still need to be independently verified in controlled environment though.
Though there may be other reasons to reject cold fusion, it's hard to rule out that some future technology will draw power from something plentiful. To an earlier level of science, running a steam engine from a lump of heavy metal would also be free energy.
It's really irritating. I have training in physics and actually think cold fusion is a very promising area of research. But jokers like this dude end up giving it a bad name, which makes it harder to do real research on it without losing funding for your other projects, which makes legitimate scientists pass over it even more, which makes even more loons take the stage.
Le sigh.
I'm not saying that this is what happened, but that's a pretty important loophole in all this, no?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EhvD4KuAEmo&feature=playe...!
If it's all a hoax, it's a very elaborate one.
I'm not sure I buy the explanation.