> There are, to me some language red flags. The followup article now uses "we' -- suggesting this is not the work of an individual. This was not present in the initial post.
First person plural ("we") is normal in technical and scientific writing.
First person plural ("we") is normal in technical and scientific writing.
The followup definitely uses the "I" (for opinion) initially, but then switches to "we".
As a reader I am not a participant in "we" unless I agree with the statements being made. I think it is this is what made me frosty and say who is this other person, because it isn't me.