If this becomes the case, Musk can use that as leverage to threaten to litigate if twitter doesn't accept a lower offer price.
That might be the plan, but what prevents Twitter from continuing to reasonably cooperate? You take it granted that there will be a point where twitter says no, but why?
Now that he can't simply walk away and pay $1B. The contract he signed has a few extremely limited circumstances where the deal may fall through, and in those few cases, he would pay the $1B. In any other case, he has to pay the full amount.
The $1B breakup was for a narrow set of cases, outside of those he's on the hook for the whole amount. Every move now is just part of the negotiation for how much he's going to pay get out of the deal.
There's also a moral hazard here. If Musk is allowed to walk away with zero consequence, he was able to hold Twitter hostage for however many months where they could have potentially had other suitors. It writes the playbook for other large companies to do the same.
The fact that Twitter seem to have tried to stonewall him will just "prove" to him that he is right and he can afford to be stubborn enough to drag this out.
That may be, but it's not part of the contract, and it's very unlikely to materially impact the future revenue of Twitter to a high enough degree that it would be a breach of the signed contract, so all he would be doing is assisting the dirty laundry of his new company in public.