Counting ballots by hand sucks. Moving paper ledgers physically sucks.
Unfortunately it has yet to be demonstrated that it can be done well, let alone perfectly.
Counting ballots by hand sucks. Moving paper ledgers physically sucks.
Unfortunately it has yet to be demonstrated that it can be done well, let alone perfectly.
Here's a paper with details in PDF form [1], and here it is in HTML [2]. Here's a paper proving that it is coercion-resistant [3]. Here's a Wikipedia article [4] on it.
Voting systems with these kind of verification/auditing capabilities are called "end-to-end auditable" or "end-to-end voter verifiable" systems, and here is some information on them in general [5].
[1] https://www.usenix.org/legacy/event/evt08/tech/full_papers/c...
[2] https://www.usenix.org/legacy/event/evt08/tech/full_papers/c...
[3] https://eprint.iacr.org/2010/502.pdf
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scantegrity
[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/End-to-end_auditable_voting_sy...
Maybe in the US, a lot of places do it just fine so.