Oh the documentation of Setter is fun:
https://hackage.haskell.org/package/lens-5.1.1/docs/Control-...
Absolutely nothing explained whatsoever. Yup, sounds like like the typical, familiar Haskell experience of zero useful docs where you need them.
https://hackage.haskell.org/package/lens-5.1.1/docs/Control-...
Absolutely nothing explained whatsoever. Yup, sounds like like the typical, familiar Haskell experience of zero useful docs where you need them.
I use the lens library all the time and those docs make perfect sense, particularly if you apply just the teensiest bit of logic and thing “Could a setter, perhaps, set something?”. It’s a DSL, and you don’t understand the domain - I’m sure you’d have a great time explaining this function from LLVM without referring to any other part of the documentation to give it context https://llvm.org/doxygen/group__LLVMCCoreValueInstructionGet.... What’s a GEP? Under the rules you’re applying to the lens documentation, I’m not allowed to look that up, because it should be immediately obvious.
> Get the source element type of the given GEP operator
Notice the relentness repetition that provides precision and clarity? I now know the argument GEP is a GEP operator. Might seem redundant, but it allows a new reader to start from any point and find their way to the relevant terms / nouns and their types.