> willful misinterpretation of the 2nd amendment that has been specifically rejected by the Supreme Court

I can interpret the text how I want, regardless of the opinion of a captured, political organization like the SC.

> It’s also contrary to many state constitutions, which provide an even more definitive individual, affirmative right to bear arms.

See: Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution (again, I reject the SC's opinion on these matters, so I believe the supremacy clause should override those state's constitutions)

I'm not going to reply to you again, though, because clearly we have different base axioms we're starting from here.