Hacker News Reader

Comment by deleted_account | Hacker News Reader

"The software programmer with the $100,000 loan said that his options were about to vest, which left him with two choices: He could sell the options back to Bolt, or go through with the purchase."

What sort of option agreement requires employees to immediately exercise on vesting? That seems odder than the rest of the story.

View on HN

Yes, there are some key details missing here. Was the employee laid off? If he did , and the options didn't vest, then there is nothing to do here. They can't use the loan to exercise the options, because he has no vested options. If the employee wasn't laid off, then why does he have to pay off the loan?

Sometimes, you can early exercise options before they have vested. There can be some tax advantages to do this, but one pretty big disadvantage, is if you exercise options before they vest and you leave the company, then you don't get the options.

A 100K loan that is interest free is pretty generous. I'd happily take a 100K interest free loan.

The exercise window can be quite short. I'm in a similar situation with a 3 month exercise window about 3 years from now, with a valuation that's dropped significantly from when I purchased the warrants.

That seems incredibly employee unfriendly

What the hell, I’ve only seen that for leaving/getting fired.

If you stay you get 10 years to exercise normally.

Most places have a 3 month window in my experience.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com