No, it’s asking a question about our knowledge of the scale and power of the devices and forces involved.
If it is a analog to wind turbines, the math will bear it out, but it’s a perfectly valid question to ask.
If it is a analog to wind turbines, the math will bear it out, but it’s a perfectly valid question to ask.
It’s sad that this is such a common argument against progress. Where do people learn to think this way? Does it come from education? Failures in life?
The concern is that more information should be discovered about the effects, and that is usually done through experimentation.
> ”Where do people learn to think this way? ”
Where do people learn to create straw man arguments instead of actually replying to what was said?
"The grass is always greener on the otherside."
I believe that's where this line of thinking comes from.
Have you ever tried to change lanes because yours isn't moving, just to find that right after you change to your new lane it stops and your old lane picks up again? Man that sucks