House takes Senate's bad Internet censorship bill, tries making it worse
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
Everything about the DMCA and safe harbor gets thrown out the window. These folks even have the audacity to redefine the word "including" to mean "including but not limited to" which is pretty shady.
There are people more capable than me who are writing about it -- Start with http://www.techdirt.com/blog/?tag=protect+ip
And I am positive that I am making a difference and that my actions will directly lead to this being dragged out longer, being amended to make it more palatable (less bad), or in the best but least likely case, being killed.
Being killed isn't really the goal by the way, the entertainment industry has been doing this long since before the Internet (they thought the VCRs would destroy the movie industry). The goal is to help alleviate some of their specific concerns with specific legislation, rather than broad strokes that impact all of us widely.
The DMCA wasn't great, but it hasn't been that big a deal for us to work with and still build great companies.