Italy Is Held Back by 2.6M People Who Have Given Up on Work
bloomberg.com
bloomberg.com
Some of that 20% is black market but most of it is lost opportunity.
- in Italy the amount of jobs that are carried illegally, without a contract, is huge. Particularly when you’re young or in certain sectors, having a contract is a dream. The state counts these illegal workers as unemployed.
- in general, the work market is toxic. There is no minimum wage and salaries are so low and work conditions so shitty that, sometimes, people feel it might not be worth it
Really, the country has so many structural problems that these stats can’t be just read in such a superficial way.
You work hours and hours and get peanuts for your efforts. While your employer buys the 5th Porsche.
I come from one of the richest regions, yet as an IT professional I felt appreciated only when I started working abroad. No matter how much I tried, most job offers in Italy are ridiculous.
We'll get UBI and robots eventually and this will be the status quo everywhere.
PS: I think this is not a stupid analogy, but instead helps to explain why the shift won't be sudden but steady, and it has already started a while back. It is a continuous development.
I see a parallel in the rise of cuneiform and silicon: both find their primary application in optimizing bureaucracies.
[1] https://www.cer-rec.gc.ca/en/data-analysis/energy-markets/pr...
Why would I?
Why would anyone want to sacrifice one third of their life, if not more, only to still be short on rent for a studio appartment? Especially in my country where rents are through the roof and leases are 1 year max. There is no stability. I cannot build anything here. Not even a home.
Plus the older I get, the less interested I am in material things. I have a Toyota Yaris. It gets me from A to B reliably. I don't need, or want a Ferrari. It's the same with everything else that I own. They all do their jobs perfectly fine. I have no need for more 'stuff' so I have no need for more money to buy better and more stuff. I can't take any of that with me to the grave anyway.
If I don't care about this 'stuff' then why would I care to work for someone whose only goal is to acquire more of this stuff for themselves? Or why would I want to work for a company that only produces more of this stuff to sell to poor souls who find meaning in this meaningless stuff? Especially when most of it just serves to destroy our environment further.
I really don't care about work any more and for the first time, I feel free.
Oh man I’d love to spend my days productively, unfortunately I have to work.
Unfortunately in many places on earth you will have real problem continuing after such a holiday. Not from the same position you were in for sure.
Not to mention things change when you have a family of your own, old parents etc.
It's primarily a good thing in regards of taxes as you pay less in that time.
Do you mean something different? Haven't heard a free sabbatical from spd
Never came across of it, tx.
Genuinely curios.
The way I see it is I can slave away at a job I hate to barely afford the things I need to live and be miserable, or I can do away with all of that and still face the same level of uncertainty and miserableness. Might as well make it a bit easier on myself in the process.
I'm a polar opposite from you. I enjoy working and actual feel depressed and anxious when not doing anything. I just have an excess of energy that needs to be spent.
I prefer spending that energy traveling, talking to people and meeting new people, hobbies, and the like. These activities cost money so I'm fine with spending most of my days on a job that will earn me money to at least occasionally do what I love most.
But even without the possibility of doing anything that I truly love I would still have no issue spending 12 hours a day, every day, working. The alternative--not doing anything--horrifies me.
Hustle and bustle is not the only way to do things. Actually frenetic laborious activities might just as well let some people feel like they are wasting their attention.
As the article point, the issue is largely led by a mindset.
I don’t mean one mindset is "better" than the other, but there are more than one way to experience life out there, and not all of them converge to maximize the GDP as an unquestionable holly quest.
But it sounds like you have a lot in savings so maybe it won't be an issue?
OTOH, this is the only thing that consistently breaks me from stagnation.
Why not trying to buy your own land and build a small community around it?
Might be much more fulfilling with very little money required.
I live in Germany and everything just costs money but if you are in the USA, there are plenty of very cheap areas were you can easily life self sustainable?
You can be certain you won’t be able to afford anything, and eventually be in deep shit.
And you only get it after all your riches are gone.
After that your Rente/retirement money will become a real struggle.
I don't envy anyone going this road but I also don't mind it.
Thanks for the checkin and reminder of how far I have come, though! :)
Yea, your story makes no sense
That's a legitimate question. The "trick" is to either work for someone not trying to acquire more stuff for themselves, like a non-profit or a collective. And of course working something that is pleasurable to yourself, not random busywork with no real purpose.
Realising how that sounds, I'm not trying to convince or argue with you, just sharing a different perspective. Every person is different - some like material wealth ( i personally enjoy various stuff money can buy, although certainly not Ferrari-level stuff), some like wealth for the sake of it ( most billionaires still at it).
On the other hand I know the story from a few people getting rich fast (crypto and fang) who just sit at home and play the same game for years now.
Good for them (if that doesn't make them depressed) but normally not having any money makes life quite different.
I also think it's unfair for me to have this plan and being able to achieve it while on the other side of our planet people still work like 6 days a week for consumerism.
This is seen as one of the major changes.
With the average net salary in Italy being around 1500€s per month, 800 is enough to get by, especially in the south where cost of living is much lower.
All low income or seasonal jobs now are just skipped by the recipients of the basic income, for two reasons:
1) there is no point anymore going to work for a salary that isn't significantly better.
2) in case they lose the job they will also not qualify for basic income for some time as well. So they don't take jobs to avoid losing the basic income.
I don't know what to think about it, I most definitely oppose basic income as it is. No point into having a basic income if you don't have a system that tries to lift people from it and put them in the job market.
The "reddito di cittadinanza" (universal basic income), depending on a number of factors, is something in the range 500-800 Euro/month.
In theory this income is linked to a sort of unemployment office that should offer (quickly) actual jobs, you can refuse up to three of them and then you are out of the program, but in reality these jobs are never offered or are offered after several months and there are probably endless ways to workaround the limit.
Starting this year the "three strikes" rule becomes "two strikes", but even this stricter rule - while it may reduce the amount of people supported by this income - won't do anything about the actual issue (having more people working).
The two proposals have different limits:
1st proposal must be within 80 km from place of residence or however reachable with public transport in 100 minutes or less
2nd one can be anywhere in Italy
Both, particularly the second, are simply non-realistic for low wage/entry level jobs.
That’s the whole idea anyway. Any salary should come on top of the basic income.
if you work a job that pays less than UBI it's almost per definition not enough to survive. why work and starve if you could just starve?
Millions of people were pushed out of their jobs and either can’t get back in, or choose not to and decide to cut their cloth accordingly.
The shutdowns and restrictions also killed a lot of materialism and led people to live cheaper and simpler lives etc with lower spend.
Then we have the inflationary effects of the money printing reducing the value of the cash people do earn and pushing things like houses further away from reach.
All 3 of the above apply to me some degree and I am also ambivalent towards working as a result.
Maybe these are all good things for the individual, society and the environment, but none are great for the economy.
Actual market is supposed to follow the trend and finally kill off the infinite growth myth.
The actual government, as many others in the recent years, follow interests from USA in their geopolitical stanzas instead of Italian one (one of the reasons some Citizens accuse it of high treason, while the majority simply do not care) and the country slowly sinks on its own weight because a society can't prosper if there is a so deep difference between rich and poor and no mode middle class in between. That's is. Of course that's denied by most because neoliberals have drawn such society so it must be good. Right wings say the fault is in young and slackers who profit from the (demolished) social system to live as parasites, left-wings (dummy left, clerical in reality) say the fault is covid, Ukraine, grasshoppers and a bad quantum conjunction between a butterfly in the South Pacific and a shrimp fart but none want to admit that a functional society must be social with a difference between rich and poor, but not too much, with a social system, without being an actual fascio-Chinese system etc.
Many instead of considering the power of numbers and so create a simple and not-necessary-violent nationwide mass strike imposing government and their private accomplices going to trials for MANY crimes coming back to a Republic decide that's nothing to do because all others do nothing in a loop and left the world advance seeing evolution from the window. Some like me choose years ago to emigrate even though I still have to find an active population to a point of thinking back at classic aristocracy and bourgeois models...
Spaniard here. This has been the norm for decades in some parts of the country (p.e. South and the PER subside). I am Andalusian; don't beat me up with the PER thing. I know what I am talking about.
So, not sure if that's the reason for this huge 2.6M numbers in Italy.
Since taxes was and are NEVER fair, never used to keep the society egalitarian, avoiding too much difference between rich and poor most people see the State as an enemy, civil servant as thief, preferring to cultivate a personal garden than a whole common one. For all political opinions.
In the end if for instance a plumber do a bad job obtaining justice in court is somewhat possible but only after MANY years and only for far less than the real damage and only if in the meantime the bad enterprise have not change enough names to being a different legal entity and have economical capacity to pay the damage, .......... so most prefer surveil and ignore legal protection at a whole. Such behavior let many at all level committing various crimes including some at State level passing reforms against people/national interests with excuses while most simply ignore them.
In the VERY recent past Italy was a significant industrial power, self-demolished with the UK and USA help and local corruption, nowadays most young want to emigrate, and the once-almost-public big industrial system is teared apart. Qualified workers goes elsewhere, entrepreneurs of technical value works most with foreign third parties and private equity demolish the economical humus still there. It's not just Italy IMVHO but a global neoliberal phenomenon in a transition from industry to pure finance in the blind and criminal illusion that finance can rule nature, so far only (re)emerging global power (Russia and China) seems to have a bit of classic development behind to back their growth up. Unfortunately they are not exactly Democracies. Unfortunately people here allow local élites to copy JUST the non-democratic aspects of such emerging power like the actual neoliberal push toward a western-Chinese-alike society witch is itself as "socialist" as original nazi economy...
In the end, just see the source:
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/jan/11/trump-...
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/17/nazis-based-th...
https://www.heritage-history.com/index.php?c=read&author=car... (see especially at the bottom of the page)
the classic two horse strategy that apparently works well all the time...
I'm not saying that Italy and Spain don't have the worst numbers, they probably do, but I am very suspicious about how real the "good" numbers are.