Elon Musk welcomes global recession
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
I think we should judge recipients of government subsidies by whether they leverage them into genuine technological advances, or simply treat them as a teat to suck upon. Judged by that standard, SpaceX has done much better than its "OldSpace" competitors such as Boeing or ULA, who have received significantly greater subsidies yet achieved a lot less with them. But proponents of the "SpaceX government subsidies" narrative – present article included – rarely seem to consider the issue from that angle.
And Musk is hardly the only CEO saying "we view the coming recession as more of a business opportunity than a threat, even as economically beneficial in the long-term". That way of viewing recessions – assuming a business is in overall good health – is commonly taught at business schools. But Musk is a controversial celebrity, so when he says it – instant controversy-brewing clickbait – when some other CEO of whom few have heard says the same thing, I doubt The Guardian would cover it.
That’s how the world works. How much of a Twitter following do the CEOs of ULA and Boeing have? Do their C-suites have legions of followers who will spring to their defense when they don’t care for the tone of a news article? Boeing has a market cap 10% of Tesla’s. How do ULA and other companies compare?
Are their CEOs the richest person in the world?
Have any CEOs even said something similar?
Is it still a knockoff if the internals are different?
Is the Impossible Burger a knockoff of the Whopper?
Yes, because talking about a simple electric car like the roadster (no "autopilot" etc) the most complicated thing is the frame and the suspension aka geometry.