A vase kept in an ordinary kitchen turned out to be a Qing-dynasty artwork
smithsonianmag.com
smithsonianmag.com
https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2010/nov/13/familys-old-ch...
Edit: it gets better. That $83M was never paid by the buyer in what may have been a protest organized by the Chinese government against the sale of looted treasures by the British. Meanwhile, the sellers were in the hook for a $14M estate tax that was based on the auction price.
https://www.liveauctioneers.com/news/top-news/antiques/repor...
Key phrase: estate tax. This was a taxable transfer of property that someone didn't take to the grave.
[1] https://www.gov.uk/inheritance-tax
> Inheritance Tax is a tax on the estate (the property, money and possessions) of someone who’s died. > > There’s normally no Inheritance Tax to pay if either: > > the value of your estate is below the £325,000 threshold > > you leave everything above the £325,000 threshold to your spouse, civil partner, a charity or a community amateur sports club
Somebody almost got away with something there.
As I understand it, as modified, this thing is pretty much valueless. I'd love it if there was a chance otherwise. Even more, I think by the time of the Qing Dynasty, China production of vases was huge. Some might have been worth millions but most were just throw-aways. I think Ai Weiwie was able to have an art show smashing Chinese vases because there are so many of them around.
https://www.futurelearn.com/info/courses/art-crime/0/steps/1...
https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E5%A4%A7%E6%B8%85%E4%B9%BE%E9%...