Please define "being part of a well-regulated militia" in terms of bearing arms in the current US situation.
The entire premise of individuals owning weapons is based on that "well-regulated militia", yet no such entities actually exist in 2022.
The entire premise of individuals owning weapons is based on that "well-regulated militia", yet no such entities actually exist in 2022.
This is why DC vs Heller was decided in the way it was. The "well-regulated militia" before the comma meant something totally different than its current meaning.
As an aside, I think that most modern military weapons should be banned, but that is actually not what the 2nd amendment calls for. The right solution to the problem is to amend the constitution, not try to pass gun control laws and see what a court will approve.