If the victims of these crimes had guns(or threat of having a gun), what would the statistics look like?
Sounds like we should keep the guns ??
> The only difference is easy access to guns.
You're unwilling to explain why you chose India, and unable to accept the data from other countries that invalidates your simplistic "theory".
Well, at least now you understand how people can hold on to beliefs despite easily available data which contradicts them.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_massacres_in_India
China, with knives:
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/06/09/china/china-knife-attacks...
These things happen everywhere, aren’t necessarily reported in the same way.
One part of why they are so prevalent in America is how each event becomes such a cultural focus, half of what I’ve seen on social media has been people posting about this event. Perpetuating the idea by giving it such attention must be part of the cause that people go out and do these things.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_major_crimes_in_...
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10629425/amp/Everyo...
> Stabbings have never been worse or more brutal, police say, as Australian hospitals struggle to cope with an emerging 'knife culture' amongst young men.
There are certainly differences in rates, but these things happen everywhere.
How many mass shootings have taken place in the US this year?
10? 20?
Try 213.
243 deaths, 922 injuries.
This month? 44 mass shootings. 61 deaths, 219 injured.
These things don't happen everywhere. They happen here because guns make them easy. People hate facts and so they pretend that everyone has the same problems.
The kind of thing that happened in Texas has not happened 44 times this month.