The age restriction is illegal, just ruled on by CA Supreme Court.
Social Media activity check is a violation of the 4th amendment.
You can't tax or gate a right by requiring someone to join a militia.
Social Media activity check is a violation of the 4th amendment.
You can't tax or gate a right by requiring someone to join a militia.
Checking your activity on social media during a firearms background check is not a violation of the 4th amendment.
You can certainly enforce the second amendment militia requirement, although it will require a vast different SCOTUS than the one we have now.
The government looking through your personal information requires due process, otherwise its a violation of the 4th amendment.
Who knew the solution was so easy.
Likewise, if the first amendment said something along the lines of "A personal connection with his creator being necessary for a upstanding and moral citizen, Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of a religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..." I think you'd also have a hard time arguing that athiests and agnostics don't have a right to free expression or to not have a religion forced upon them by the government.
If it was non-public activity, I could imagine a court finding that it is. I could also imagine courts finding using social media activity that doesn't unambiguously indicate intent to commit a crime as part of a firearms background check to be a violation of the 1st and 2nd amendments.
You might get agreement on that point. You won't get agreement on what the bugs are, though, so fixing them by changing the Constitution is rather difficult.
However right now trust in the government is so low that even if the constitution was amended many gun owners would probably be unlikely to accept the result.
2/3rds of each house, 3/4ths of the states