If Europe and Japan can have small, cheap EVs, why can’t America?
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
Tesla has built a BMW-level car, in terms of styling, features, and comfort. There are competitors, increasingly from traditional carmakers, but they are all building the same style of car: the look and feel of a gasoline-powered car that runs on electricity. Of course, given America's (insane) attachment to pickup trucks, those are getting the electric treatment too. But it's the same idea: take the gasoline powered vehicle, and design an EV to mirror it, to be as familiar as possible.
But think about how PCs replaced minicomputers and mainframes. These little joke computers that IBM and CDC and DEC and HP and Burroughs and Data General did not take seriously finally killed those companies (except for IBM, and HP bears no resemblance to what it used to be). The PCs didn't become replacements for minis and mainframes, they provided a completely different model of computing that eventually won out thanks to rapid hardware improvements, software improvements made possible by rapidly improving hardware, and importantly, a new generation of computer users, who were not brainwashed into the old way of thinking about computing.
I look at electric bikes as being the analog of the PC. I doubt that many car manufacturers look at these things as competition. But they are. If you are young, you need to travel ten miles to work, you are crushed by student debt, and you have some concern about climate issues, an electric bike is awfully appealing. Yes, the weather needs to cooperate, but it's a pretty small step from the electric bikes we have now, to slightly more protected machines that work in inclement weather.
What about longer drives? EVs (i.e., Tesla and their ilk) aren't so great there either. Range anxiety is real, recharging takes way more than 5 minutes (even with level 3 chargers), and good like finding one on your random road trip. You have to plan it in advance.
Completing the analogy: gasoline cars are like mainframes, and EVs as they currently exist are analogous to minicomputers. They will cease to exist in 20 years. They'll be displaced on the low end by electric bikes, and they cannot compete on the high end (long trips) with gasoline-powered cars.
If Americans on the whole liked small cars, we'd have small cars. Obviously, we either don't, or there's a very exploitable market gap there for some venture capitalist to exploit. If I had to put money on it though, I'd guess the former.
1) They don't want to be exposed to elements.
2) They want to have some kind of protection during accident.
I also notice that e-bikes are becoming more popular for delivery people in New York City. Hard to see how those people could do there jobs as efficiently with cars.
Bike-sized powered transport has undeniable advantages over car-sized vehicles: access, cost, climate-friendlier. And younger generations are less enamored of cars. I can’t see how e-bikes don’t win in a generation.
Someone could respond mentioning long distances and various state situations, but those valid concerns aside there are tens of millions of people in US cities with 100% the same density and driving needs as those of people in Europe and Japan, which still don't have anywhere near the same cars (not speaking about EVs specifically, but smaller cars in general too).
And God Forbid they e.g. don't put their 2 kids in a SUV, because obviously you can't make do with a small car once you have a family - nevermind that's what millions of Europeans do by choice...
Amusing idea require anything over 2 tons stay in the right lane except to pass.
Still... yeah, there were somewhat clearer ways to make the joke.