But I have a strong personal bias against the Economist, and I feel like you used it as an example of a more serious journalist-y news.
I feel that the Economist is resting on its historic good name but has become a simple liberal rag that people use as a virtue signal. It's a terrible news source, incredibly and unabashedly biased, and the only time I have ever heard of it has been in Washington DC where only the most insufferable people smugly declare they read it cover to cover.
I would humbly submit better outlets like The Week, Barron's, or maybe Quanta.