Hacker News Reader

Comment by unsafecast | Hacker News Reader

Okay, let's do a bit of math.

Each year, Bitcoin produces ~37 megatonnes of CO2 per year (https://www.downtoearth.org.in/blog/environment/as-cryptocur...), and i won't consider any other cryptocurrency.

Now, let's assume for a moment that every single youtube video is a cat video, since i found nothing about how much people watch these. So 10 megatonnes of CO2 per year (https://www.wired.co.uk/article/youtube-digital-waste-intera...).

Obviously this is very unfair to cats. But even if that were the case, with this calculation being _really_ biased for crypto, it's still very bad.

View on HN

Howaboutism seems to be a core crypto tenet, until someone comes back with a response like this. I also keep hearing "how much energy does the legacy banking system spend"... to which the only real response is: for the value it provides humanity, very little, unlike the top cryptocurrencies.

The "legacy banking system" you are referring to is probably something similar to the ECB or the FED. Only 13% of the world population live under a stable financial system or democracy. So please check your financial privilege.

if you have to resort to telling someone to check their privilege you've already run out of arguments.

I mean am I wrong? I'm assuming you are from the US, Canada or Europe when you say central banks have a net positive impact on society so I can presume you are clearly speaking form a point of privilege. You've never suffered through strict capital controls and hyperinflation. You can participate in any investment scheme without the need to supply spurious amounts of impossible documentation. You are not sanctioned. You may even have born in the right place. Am I wrong? Doesn't that sound like privilege to you?

It's one thing to say "the x you're talking about only applies to some small percentage of the overall global market".

But if you're worried about people's privilege you're missing the point and thats what makes you wrong, because nobody with any intelligence responds to 'check your privilege' with anything but derision. focus on the argument with your own logical persuasive argument instead of accusing your opponent of some sort of original sin.

shouting "check your privilege" at the end of a crypto argument isn't checkmate, rather it reduces your argument to one of nonsense. Discuss ideas.

I just re-read this and the english is terrible, i guess i was tired or something. The point still stands though.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com