Hacker News Reader

A few quick observations:

At one point, the text at the top started saying "Rate NaN movies".

You seem to start off with extremely popular movies. Those movies seem unlikely to generate a range of ratings. You might consider starting off with movies that a large number of people have rated but which polarize people, which would help differentiate people sooner and improve the quality of the circles.

At one point the "I didn't see this movie" links became french: "Je n'ai pas vu ce film".

In one category, I hit "I didn't see this movie", and later the same movie showed up in another category.

I found it slightly odd that the rating scale goes from 0.5 to 5 stars, rather than 0 to 5 stars.

I rated all the films deegr showed in the first batch, and they all disappeared, but now I don't see an obvious next step. The rotating deegr explanation banners at the top mention something about "refine your search after rating a few movies", and shows an icon for that, but I don't see that icon anywhere in the interface. I finally found that clicking on the "Deegr Circle" dropdown, then "Deegr Circle" under that, led me to something useful.

Once I get to the mode showing a circle of other people, I don't see any options for "I haven't seen this film" anymore.

Once you start recommending a circle of people, and recommending other films liked in that circle, that encourages rating those films too, which seems unlikely to change the circle.

I'd love to see an explanation of the name. Best guess: modified form of "dig"?

Thanks a lot Josh, that's some heavy feedback.

We'll take some time this week to search & fix the translations you reported.

As for the mainstream recommendation, I've edited the original post: we'll soon let you users get rid of mainstream recommendations in a single click.

Regarding the scale starting at 0 instead of 0.5, that's because you have to give them a .5, that's for several reasons: for example, you wouldn't know if you've rated the movie a 0 or not when clicking somewhere left of the stars. Also we think it's more disgraceful to get a 0.5 than a 0. And other reasons.

Regarding "but now I don't see an obvious next step.", this sounds weird; you should normally have been redirected to a search result (a Circle) straight out of rating 5 movies, no more. Isn't that what happened?

There's no other "I haven't seen this movie" once you land your first search Circle, because there's no point. Either you haven't seen it and it stays as a recommendation (which you can add to your deegList), or you really don't want to see it and you can therefore Mute it with the "-" sign.

Yep, deegr, derived from digging. It's quick, catchy, simple, easy to type and to say... And it was available :/

I don't think an option to hide mainstream recommendations does quite what I want. That would help when looking for more out-of-the-way hidden gems for recommendations, but it doesn't help when trying to rate films I've seen to improve the quality of my circle. I'd still suggest that you propose rating movies that polarize people heavily, as a partitioning technique. This works both in the general case (show me movies that many people rated, but which get both very high and very low ratings frequently), and in the specific case based on the contents of your circle (help me rate movies that would differentiate me from members of my current circle, not just movies that would reinforce my circle).

As for 0.5 versus 0, fair enough; it just seemed a bit quirky. :)

> Regarding "but now I don't see an obvious next step.", this sounds weird; you should normally have been redirected to a search result (a Circle) straight out of rating 5 movies, no more. Isn't that what happened?

Nope; I kept rating movies, until eventually all of the initial sets of films disappeared, and nothing else happened.

> There's no other "I haven't seen this movie" once you land your first search Circle, because there's no point. Either you haven't seen it and it stays as a recommendation (which you can add to your deegList), or you really don't want to see it and you can therefore Mute it with the "-" sign.

Fair enough. However, I wonder: do you take "mute" into account when doing recommendations, or just hide films? In particular, I see a number of films for which I could either rate them 0.5 ("I can tell from the trailer that this will suck") or mute them ("I guess I should reserve judgement, but I don't ever want to see it").

One more misplaced translation: "Retour en haut".

Polarizing the ratings seems like a nice way to quickly make them go their own way, indeed. With our algorithm, rating 'not popular' movies works just as well actually; but maybe we should also show movies people shoulDN'T like? I had given thoughts about it, but the layout is already kind of 'full', so it's not very easy. We'll definitely look into it though; thanks a lot.

No, we don't currently take into consideration movies that have been muted or added to the deegList, but just like the polarization, we've already given thoughts about it (especially for this) and will probably take it into account in the next algorithm update. Thanks again ;)

You might find this useful: http://times.usefulinc.com/2007/03/06-sparklines

Note the second and third cases under "middle ranking". That seems like a category of films you should present to help add more nuance to a user's ratings and circle.

I love recommendation engines so your service sounds really interesting. Some impressions:

* I LOVE that you don't require a sign-up to get started. The fact that I can start rating right off the front page is equally good.

* I don't grok how the right side "Recommendation Summary" widget works. I rate stuff and they... disappear? Wait, aren't these supposed to be recommendations in the first place? So where are the ratings (starts)? Also, what's the relation between this widget and the content to the left (my "circle")?

* To the left, I'm seeing some dude's ratings. Maybe you should change the graphics for dude's ratings and my ratings? Because both are in blue.

* As I mention I already use several recommendation engines. I would really love to submit my Criticker profile page and have the ratings imported. Because you know I have spent hours rating stuff over the course of several years.

* I don't see the purpose of "You both rated : (20)" In the left content pane. Also, it takes up a lot of visual space.

* This is pretty fun to use.

* Some of the UI - sub-items of the Movies tab; the hover for the Register link - are still in French.

* I've seen most of the recs I'm getting. Again, if there was a way to import ratings from other sites it would make a huge difference.

Hey Arkitaip, thanks for that review! So, in order: * yes thanks, we had "keep it simple" in mind ;)

* 2 and * 3: the left side shows your different matchs' ratings (what they've liked, what they haven't). The right side shows a reorganized summary of all the movies liked by the 30 people whose tastes best match yours. It's all explained when you hover your cursor over the top of that column ;)

* Yes, we've thought about that. I can't tell yet if we're going to work on that soon or not; it would be pretty easy since we've crawled the profiles already, but that's kind of unfair to the other websites, it feels like we'd be stealing profiles - whereas right now, we only reference them.

* 'You both rated' helps you have a quick glance at how well you and the person in question have in common. We've tried without it, and quite frankly, it's better with; juste to know on what kind of movies you both match. The number in parenthesis is the total number of movies in common with similar ratings.

* ^^

* Woopsie! We'll fix that asap!

* Yeah, it's not the first time we're told the Recommendation Summary shows some mainstream movies. Well that's because they've liked a lot, so pragmatically, we HAVE to recommend them; and if you liked/hated them, rate them away!

HOWEVER please note, we're only weeks away from an update that will allow you to hide Mainstream recommendation in a single click, so please be patient!

Thanks again for that full review! And don't forget: the more you rate, the better the accuracy.

FYI, you might want to check out this:

http://www.betabeat.com/2011/10/26/quit-netflix-meet-the-net...

I've just now been using it, and it's pretty interesting...

I like it!

I actually found a new movie that related to the ratings I supplied, nor have I seen it before, good stuff.

Here are some thoughts:

1. I've feed Netflix a lot of my data over the years. A link from each movie to a Netflix result would show how Netflix rates it related to me. Maybe you don't want to push people to Netflix, but it's useful information to me.

2. I don't really care about the "people" I care about the movies. As I click through the results I see a lot of duplicate movies under different people. Remove or leave the people category, I don't care, but strip away the duplicate results...

All in all I find it useful.

Thanks coffee, glad you like it.

1. Oh yes we want to push Netflix! We're just a small french project and Netflix has not invaded us as of this date; and is unlikely to do so for sometime, actually. I know what you're talking about and we'll see how/if we can implement it.

2. Well that's a bummer, deegr's all about finding others like you ^^ If we only recommended movies without telling you why you should like them, we'd ressemble every other engine out there! Don't you like knowing you have taste-mates out there?

Yea I guess it would be interesting to know I have taste mates out there. But I feel like that's the bigger picture, once I regularly engage with you application. My perspective is one of, what do I get out of this right now, first time using it, that brings me back to enjoying the people matching in the future... Just my 2 cents...

Cool stuff though. I really like where your going with it. I instantly found it useful to find a new movie which is what is the most important to me now ( tomorrow following taste mates may trump that )

Generic comment: I like it a lot! Good UI, fast engine, good results

Secondary comments/suggestions:

1. After I voted a few movies I could see a list of similar people and a number of suggested movies. I could also see the movies other people liked, their votes and vote for them. As an UI suggestion make sure that when I put my mouse over another user's vote I understand that I can vote -- currently is not obvious

2.There is some french here and there...

3.I would love to see some simple "Watch this..." screen that is centered more to suggested movies and less on similar people. After all I am here to find movies!

Hey, thanks a lot for the boost! 1. Mmmm we should probably change de stars' color when hovering over them, to make people understand that they're in charge atm 2. Yes, I've read that a lot today. My engrish isn't so bad I guess, but it seems like after countless sneezy testings, I've missed a few trads... 3. Again, problem is that we've already focused a lot on movies not people; if we focus even less on the people, then they will almost disappear, and deegr will lose its special ingredient (ie. finding people that are like you).

Maybe you will actually find it useful to find people like you when you can find people like you from your town/age/sex/opposite sex... See what I mean? ^^

This is great, but in spending about 10 minutes on it I only see movies I've already seen - almost every film I came across in those 10 minutes is not new to me and I lost interest. With 100 years of film history to watch, thousands of indie films, foreign films - I want to know what is highly recommended of something more obscure that is worth my time to find. I guess this is just a start for you, it works well otherwise and I'll check back a later time to see if it works well for books also (I know less about good books than movies so maybe this will be more interesting for me).

Thanks marquis; I've just edited the main message to say that we're already working on a feature that will enable you to remove mainstream movies in a single click. So please stay tuned, it should be up within a couple of weeks at most :)

I see lots of people giving a full 5 stars. Would results be better if people were more accurate, giving 3.5; 4; 4.5 or 5 stars?

What happens if you ask people to rate 10 movies with either a thumbs up or thumbs down? Would that give better results?

It's quite interesting, although I could see more use for it as part of other websites. EG: dating websites could use the tech to match people?

Good Luck though!

Thanks Dan!

Well, we will see how things evolve. You are correct in that it seems like people are more likely to give 5/5's than lower ratings; but I guess that's just one way of matching people: they can be similar in their way of rating things (they could love everything or be big time haters), deegr will match them. Also, it's not like we can't interpret ratings over 3/5 as thumbs-ups and lower ratings as thumbs-down; we can still change, only time will tell us what the best scale is. As of now, the current system seems to do a great job.

And yes, of course, we're thinking a lot about implementing it on other websites; we're already working on an API ;)

Thanks for the feedback!

As far as I can tell, I can't get from a movie shown under "so-and-so also rated" on the left to the mute button. Mute doesn't appear when hovering over the movie, and clicking on the movie opens a panel on the right which doesn't have the mute button either. And the same goes for movies I search for; searching opens the same panel on the right, which still doesn't have the mute button.

Well, since muting is not yet taken into account in the algorithm, there's no point in muting a movie you and someone have in common, or a movie that you would directly make a search for.

Muting still has a useful purpose: I don't want to see the movie in the list anymore, even if I have it in common with someone.

I've played quickly with your webapp and I really enjoyed it. I think the functionality is great and the results are pretty accurate! I was really impressed.

I would only suggest that you give people the option to rank more movies before building the circle if they want to. I think I could have gotten even better results if I could've reviewed more films.

Hope you succeed!

My first impression: what problem does this solve? Why do I want to connect with people with similar movie interests?

After I started rating movies that I've seen, I could see the value in the recommendation engine aspect...

I'm not a fan of the name either... it's not memorable.

Also, it seems that French text shows up every now and then.

Good start, keep iterating.

Well, thanks for the support;

Problem solved is giving people a reason to actually trust the recommendations made by recommendation engines. We have never known why Amazon (IMDb etc) was recommending us some movies rather than some others. There's a very strong algorithm behind these recommendations, but we believe that humanized recommendation engine is better because you can actually ask the person why he/she liked a movie and would recommend it. It's kind of like Aardvark: sometimes you want a person, not a web page, to answer your question.

The custom scrollbar on the recommendation summary loses the un-click sometimes, and keeps dragging as I move the mouse even with the button up. It also requires much more precision to grab with the mouse. Please, consider just using the browser's native scrollbars there.

I see what you mean. No one has complained so far among our current users, but you're probably right that it can be annoying. We'll look for a way to fix that issue.

The three icons below films in the "so-and-so also rated" section, which look like a plus, a TV, and a speech bubble, don't immediately suggest obvious functions to me. You might consider either adding floating help for those icons, or making them more obvious.

Roger that; we'll make tooltips I guess.

One-word summaries would suffice, actually, now that I've managed to figure out what they do. How about "deegList", "Trailer", and "Review"?

Once you know what thr icons are about, it's better to have icons; less test, visually more appealing.

How about that? At first it shows-up like words; once you've clicked one, it only ever comes back as an icon. ?

That would make it hard to get used to the interface. If you're really attached to the icons, I'd suggest leaving them, and just providing the text as tooltips.

Also, clicking on it once doesn't mean a user will know or remember what it does. :)

Something about the login form causes Firefox to not successfully fill in the previously remembered username and password. That makes it quite inconvenient to log in (have to go copy the password out of the password manager).

After a few rates I saw "Rate NaN movies". Not good. Then it wasn't clear that I had to click on "deegr circle" to find others that matched me. Finally, I don't think that half stars add any value. Keep it simple.

I found half-stars rather useful; they made it more natural to quickly give an appropriate rating. I frequently find that half-stars make me less inclined to over-rate something; 4.5 contains mostly stuff I would otherwise have rated 5, and 3.5 contains mostly stuff I would rated 4, as well as a few things I would have reluctantly rated 3.

I love this! I would say to focus more on the recommendations and see if you can integrate services like Netflix, Hulu, etc so I can see a movie that I might like and immediately go watch it.

Yep, noted; we'll try to work on that. Thanks

I rate a movie and after the "I didn't see this movie label" changes to "Je n'ai pas vu ce film", which is obviously fine for me as I know some french, but ... you go it.

Hey Ashton, thanks for letting us know. We'll look into that asap. Did you like the rest?

Sometimes the hovering image of a film doesn't match the title and the imdb entry; for instance, the film "super" showed an image of "Superman/Batman Apocalypse".

Oh, odd; we'll fix that. Thanks

It seems to work. I just don't know that I care about the results. This may say more about me than it does about your service, however!

Haha, well I guess what's to remember is that it works ^^

A few times now, I've refreshed and gotten a recommendation smumary with ratings, star icons, +, and -, but no titles.

What browser are you using please?

Firefox 7.

Ok, tested: something's wrong with Firefox. I have the same issue. That's since our last update, which was yesterday.

Looking into fixing this asap. Thanks

It should be fixed by now; please refresh.

Btw, deegr is muuuuuuch smoother on Chrome or Safari.

Why can I rate movies without logging in, but not add movies to the mute list without logging in?

Hey Josh. We prefer to have registered users than visitors, so that you too can be matched and in order to grow the userbase. That's why we've put some features only to be used after registration. On top of that, these feats are useless as a visitor; the muting will be forgotten when you come back after 48hrs.

It takes literally no more than 10 seconds to create an account, you should give it a go ;)

Would you consider supporting BrowserID to log in?

It's a possibility, but I doubt so. The current system would be enough I guess, and we've already got a lot to do/manage/fix... Well, actually, you sir just gave us a lot to do ^^

Rate my startup - deegr