Thanks for replying. I appreciate it.
But you fail to note the creation of a market happens by destroying another.
Amazon vs Book Shops, Uber vs Taxis, Cars vs Faster Horses, Netflix vs Theater Industry and DVD Rentals.[2]
There is a limit of resources and economic output per year, the ones
owning the more productive processes will get a progressive bigger share of the
output. More and more, lots of activities are zero-sum and the long term is a complete zero-sum. [3]
It's not a view from mainstream economists, because many do not want to be seen as heirs to Karl Marx ( an Economist let's not forget, not a politician).
It's also a discourse popular from a certain political current, that spouses the "we can all benefit mantra".
I prefer to use Constrain Theory [1], and be reminded that if somebody creates a more efficient Amazon, faster, cheaper, better then Amazon will not prosper. If somebody opens a new service, or creates a new product, there will less disposable income from the customers of this product to shop at Amazon.
Reminds me of a story, normally told with several variations so my details are not exact. When Henry Ford II toured some factory, he taunted some workers with the fact increased Robotic Automation would make Ford less dependent on the workers. The workers replied asking Ford how many cars he was expecting the Robots would buy?
[1] "Exponential Economist Meets Finite Physicist": https://dothemath.ucsd.edu/2012/04/economist-meets-physicist...
[2] "Capitalism: A zero-sum game": https://www.business-standard.com/article/markets/capitalism...
[3] "The Zero-Sum Economy": https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/zero-sum-econom...