A while ago I came across this post: https://towardsdatascience.com/awesome-rust-powered-command-...

I’ve also been using bat and exa which are pretty good replacements for cat and ls, respectively.

https://github.com/sharkdp/bat

https://github.com/ogham/exa

https://github.com/chmin/sd: "sd uses regex syntax that you already know from JavaScript and Python. Forget about dealing with quirks of sed or awk - get productive immediately."

It would be interesting to test the ~1.5GB of JSON the author uses for the benchmark against sed, but there are no details on how many files nor what those files contain.

When trying something relatively small and simple, sd appears to be slower than sed. It also appears to require more memory. Maybe others will have different results.

   sh # using dash not bash
   echo j > 1
   time sed s/j/k/ 1
   time -p sed s/j/k/ 1
   time sd j k 1
   time -p sd j k 1

Opposite problem as the sd author for me. For system tasks, more familiar with faster sed and awk than with slower Python and Javascript, so I wish that Python and Javascript regex looked more like sed and awk, i.e., BRE and occasionally ERE. Someone in the NetBSD core group once wrote a find(1) alternative that had C-like syntax, similar to how awk uses a C-like syntax. Makes sense because C is the systems language for UNIX. Among other things, most of the system utilities are written in it. If the user knows C then she can read the system source and modify/repair the system where necessary, so it is beneficial to become familiar with it. Is anyone is writing system utility alternatives in Rust that use a Rust-like syntax.

ncdu is amazing. I foolishly spent way too much time trying to massage du's output into something human-friendly.

sd is my favorite of the newish command line tools. Its super fast and i like the syntax a lot