Hacker News Reader

If internal procedures allow Meta employees to be paid (in cash or favors of any kind) to be internal champions for repeatedly resubmitting bans to the Integrity Team roulette appeals process, “proper” is the opposite of the word I would use to describe the practice.

That’s how “friends and family” policies work, though: the company gives you perks to bestow upon your friends, so that they can trade their relationship with you for a benefit.

She used sexual favors to get an employee to unban the account that shouldn’t have been banned in the first place. I doubt those are proper procedures as defined by Meta’s guidelines.

It’s “corruption” by any credible meaning of the word. If the story is true then it’s a catastrophe for Meta.