On https://kubirds.com I use:
jQuery appear: https://plugins.jquery.com/appear/
jQuery fancybox: https://fancyapps.com/docs/ui/fancybox/
Do not put jQuery to the trash yet, it still have a long life ahead.
Even scrolling down, and through the website, I didn't really understand it, until you compared to Nagios, which I am familiar with. Hope you don't mind a little unsolicited feedback. The website does look super clean!
I would love to read a paragraph of your elevator pitch the moment I lay my eyes on the site though. Cheers.
> I'm better than most reading poorer copy but I consider your(unchanged) copy very good.
This is nice to hear/read, yet I'm a perfectionist who knows perfection do not exist. The pitch can always be improved and clarity/transparency is very important to us.
> Unfortunately without the words"audit", "WORM" and"incident search" present or prominent I'm not your market.
This proves my previous point, since we rely on Docker images to implement the monitoring/reactivity part, literally ANY workflow/business logic can be applied (but we've been told that it's hard to trust "it can do everything").
> But I could think of many thousands of publication sites longing for your tool, if those terms applied.
I'd love to get in touch with you about that, if you have time, you can find my contact info in my profile: https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=linkdd
You're talking past one another. He's speaking in the context of AAA games, and the equivalent of that in the webdev world is a highly interactive application.
I don't know what to tell you. The first sentence in my comment was a quote and the rest of the comment was responding to say how that quote was misunderstanding the OP.
I never said anyone specifically said to do that, but that, in the metaphor that the OP made, a static website isn't an accurate comparison to a AAA game.