Please could you provide some explanations why it is a crank paper?
It's a conspiracy theory with sparkle of equations.
https://phys.org/news/2022-05-standard-particle-physics-brok...
The paper claims there are problems already with g-factor, could anybody explain why its objections are not valid?
(I explained why the narrative is not valid in another comment).
Consa brings concrete arguments regarding g-factor, I still haven't seen any concrete explanation, only saying that it is fringe science because of criticism of mainstream ... but he quotes mainstream papers.