Chinese Say They're Building 'Impossible' Space Drive, the EmDrive ('Relativity Drive')
blog.wired.com
blog.wired.com
Wouldn't it be much more interesting if they actually did violate the laws of physics?
and even if it doesn't, science needs weirdos who are willing to work on edge cases. tesla's professor told him that the AC motor was a perpetual motion device and thus impossible.
Yes, but there's more than one kind of edge.
The edge of scientific knowledge is worth paying people to explore.
The edge of your own knowledge is worth exploring on your own.
The edge of your funding agent's credulity is very profitable to explore, but such work doesn't help science at all.
[1] page 2, http://emdrive.com/theorypaper9-4.pdf
If the drive works as claimed i wonder what the efficiency is in the transformation from electrical energy to momentum.
If he does, he's not included it in his theory paper. Take a look, there is no mention of "axial forces" or "deflection" in the paper.
In equation 7, he calculates the thrust T using only the difference in propagation velocity at each plate, but makes no mention of how the propagation velocity changes. If he did, it would be obvious that you have to account for radiation pressure on all sides on the tube, not just sides which happen to be perpendicular to the tube's axis.
> efficiency in the conversion from electrical energy to momentum
The efficiency will be about 0%, so no need to worry.
i guess junk science is right. oh well.
from page 6: Note that the reflection-free interface, with matched wave impedances , will ensure no forces are produced at the interface. <-- that doesn't sound possible.
Odds are this ain't it, though.