Hacker News Reader

Comment by the_svd_doctor | Hacker News Reader

It's always been very ambiguous in practice. To avoid ambiguity I usually use `flop/s` but not everyone likes that :)

Speaking of SVD doctors, I heard many years ago (from Alan Edelman) that Gene Golub's license plate used to be "DR SVD". Later he switched to "PROF SVD".

I couldn't confirm the DR SVD part, but the PROF SVD story appears to be real: https://www.mathworks.com/company/newsletters/articles/profe...

I heard something very similar from some of his very close (ex-)colleagues, so it appears to be true :)

As I recall the Dr SVD was the license on his second car. He once left the car at SFO airport and when he heard I was flying in, he asked me to drive it to his house (keys under the seat!) What he didn't tell me was that it was a "stick shift" and I only once before had a friend teach me how that works. After driving around San Francisco for Gene I got better at it, but it was definitely scary at times. :-)

> To avoid ambiguity I usually use `flop/s` but not everyone likes that :)

Flop/s makes no sense and is outright wrong. The whole point of flops is to express how many floating point operations are required by an algorithm. How many operations are performed per second is a property of the hardware you're using to run an implementation of the algorithm.

You want to express computational complexity in terms of floating point operations.

Maybe the_svd_doctor uses flop/s to describe hardware, like you said

The number of operations per second varies by at least an order of magnitude on the same hardware depending on the GEMM algorithm you use (reference or Goto), and you quote the performance of the implementation in terms of FLOP/s knowing the number of FLOPs required by the computation. That makes sense to people who implement and measure these things.

Well, yeah, I use it in the context of floating-points-operations-per-seconds. That's the most common use in my field. I was replying to the parent comment. No need to use this kind of tone.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com