quick question: why you chose to go with HTML instead of making OPML the default file format? I'm not judging, I'm just curious.
quick question: why you chose to go with HTML instead of making OPML the default file format? I'm not judging, I'm just curious.
Also (not sure this will happen, but I plan to try) I expect to add different node types. For example right now every node is a paragraph. In future might have ... A HEADING (innovation I know). Again that maps really well to HTML, not as well to OPML.
Plus I just like the fact that .bike files are HTML. Makes me confident that they will live and be readable far into the future.
For example, Dynalist use this idea for their files
And node itself is heading, while when they need paragraph with heading they create _note="" attribute into <outline> element
But for my own use I over time realized that was a mistake. All the parsing and formatting adds complexity. I think rich text (which to be clear Bike does not yet have, though I will add soon) is a simpler way to work from user perspective. Just issue commands instead of remember and see formatting rules. It's cleaner and simpler for my uses.
Anyway, congratulations on the impressive first public release. The more outliners the better in my opinion.