While I definitely agree with your general point, how does your brother know that they’re healthy or don’t need to take the medication? I’ve never had any discussion with a pharmacist (in the US or Canada) where I’ve revealed this information.
What I really needed was my father not being dead when it mattered.
The idea that pharmacists have any meaningful diagnostic role in the US is risible.
I suspect pharmacists are the only people that some class of Americans can speak to about medical issues because they have an open storefront.
I don't know what pharmacists know about drugs, but they're useful people to speak to about insurance issues. They know the rules around age cutoffs for optional vaccines, which generics are in stock, when something will be denied by insurance, etc.
Around here (US location) my medical professional friends are all hesitant to prescribe any controlled substances to more than a certain number of their patients for fear of getting flagged.
Whenever I read these stories of people receiving benzos and other scheduled substances for years with no oversight, I can’t tell if this is actually happening regularly somewhere or if we’re just reading a lot of exaggerated second-hand stories.
I know these things happen somewhere, sometimes but the insinuation that it’s just the norm in American medicine is baffling.
I saw multiple doctors for years about anxiety issues and the most I got prescribed was an antihistamine. I also suffer from chronic back pain due to a genetic issue and it's been pretty much impossible for me to get a prescription that does anything for it.
I don't think people are lying about their experiences, I'm just baffled as to where this is going on because it's been totally opposite to my experiences.
I suspect there’s a lot of word of mouth references where patients are telling their friends which doctors prescribe which medications and giving guidance about what to say to get those prescriptions. This was definitely the case in the early opioid crisis years where the bulk of prescriptions were coming from a small number of doctors.
It’s benzodiazepines that are the problem. These should be reserved for short-term use in extraordinary circumstances, but a small number of doctors seem to hand them out too aggressively.
SSRIs and benzos are in entirely different risk categories. That’s why benzos are controlled substances and SSRIs are not.
If therapy is part of the treatment plan, they're often referred down to a psychologist or therapist for that part of things. A psychiatrist can do therapy....but their hourly rate is a whole lot higher.
----------------
As to personal experience, my current psych (ADHD), requires a ~15min "medication management" session about 4x a year. It's not exactly a ton of oversight.
The couple previous psychiatrists I've had when I lived in other places were about the same way once we got past the initial phase.
It is worth noting that my prescription (+ it's effectiveness) has been generally steady for a long time and I don't exactly have a profile in terms of age/dosage/history that suggests abuse risk.
You could always request a more in-depth conversation if necessary.
Benzos are a completely different scenario because, unlike your ADHD medication, they’re not indicated for long-term use except in extraordinary circumstances. They can’t be compared to your long-term ADHD prescriptions.
"No medical history" doesn't mean shit either, it just means you have not yet seeked help. Most don't see mental health professionals at the first sign of issues, often they only do when things are starting to crumble. And that's my experience in a country with socialized healthcare, now translate that to the US where therapy is unaffordable to a large number of people.