Why is this being treated like a new concept? Has the author never heard of layaway? It used to be quite common, and this is a strictly better version imo
These schemes are VC-ified installment loans, which operate on the opposite model: you receive the purchase up front, and pay it down over time including interest payments.
They're arguably better on a strictly economic scale, since they give consumers the liquidity to make purchases that they'd like to make (and can actually afford, just not all at once.) They're arguably worse on a social scale, since installment loans are a form of cheap credit that people get addicted to, and are comparatively unregulated.
The article was written in 2017, and mentions an APR of 19% for a $200 purchase via Affirm. Looking online it looks like their current rates are around 10-13% unless you pick the shortest term loan[1].
(I would personally consider doing installments at 0%, so I'm curious as to whether you were given an advantageous plan based on a credit check or whether it was the timescale.)
I only used it once out of pure curiosity, so idk all of the intricate details, but they essentially offered a 4 equal monthly payments plan with 0% interest, as long as I pay it off on time. Tested it, worked as promised, all was good.
I bet if you go outside of their deadlines for payments/try to stretch it for longer, you will get hit with massive interest rates tho, but cannot confirm that. Mostly because I only use credit for things I can easily pay off in cash at any moment (except things like car/house obv), so I basically treat it like a debit card and pay it off very pedantically on time (because with 0% interest, it is essentially just extra leverage).
Because if it's immediately available in a savings account, the vast majority of people are much more likely to spend it on something else. The appeal of layaway is the willpower enforcement - worth the price of whatever pocket change you're likely to get in savings-account interest.
Incidentally, where do you live that the interest on a mere savings account is worthwhile on a timescale of years rather than decades or centuries? Or am I taking "savings account" too literally when you mean things like certificates of deposit or money-market accounts?
You are making dhosek’s argument for them.
Even today, lots of people have the issue where if they _have_ money, they are compelled to spend it on frivolous things like entertainment and alcohol. Layaway was an easy and convenient tool that people could use to make sure they were putting at least some of their money toward things they really wanted.