Utrecht starts catcalling men in campaign against sexual harassment
nltimes.nl
nltimes.nl
Trying to catcall an average looking man will cause them to suffer severe stress symptoms like throwing up. If they keep doing it they'll suffer a psychiatric hospitalization and have to file a workman's comp claim against the organization doing this.
If you're willing to assume the blackballers aren't in dire need of laxatives and cognitive-behavioral therapy then you're a much more charitable person than I am.
But, for the sake of the argument, let's suppose that women only catcall attractive men. These aren't the men I'm talking about when I talk about some men being unable to see themselves as desirable, sexual beings.
> Trying to catcall an average looking man will cause them to suffer severe stress symptoms like throwing up. If they keep doing it they'll suffer a psychiatric hospitalization and have to file a workman's comp claim against the organization doing this.
I'm a man who has been catcalled (by other men who see long hair and automatically think "woman") and I didn't experience any of these symptoms. It was annoying to be catcalled by men when I had no interest in having sex with men, but also instructive.
There's a reason I don't catcall women beyond that it's rude and counterproductive; the reason is that I've gotten a taste of what it's like to be on the receiving end and I didn't like it. However, my experience isn't universal. Other men might be lonely enough and desperate enough not to mind.
My son says that "people talk about incel terminology, such as 'x-pill' but it's really 4chan terminology... Thanks to the media, which only pays attention to mass shootings, people think it is 'incel terminology."
An ex-friend of my son is testament to the destruction wreaked by blackpill ideology, but you never hear about victims like him because he hasn't shot anybody (at least yet.)
This person quit talking to my son because my son is taller then him, turned down a chance to move into an fight club house filled with Polish neo-nazis to mooch off his parents, stole $1000 out of an envelope to buy illegal anabolic steroids (I couldn't get him to work out at the gym though...) About the only good thing that happened was he dropped out of Wheat Waffle's cult because he (being Chinese) couldn't stand to hang out with Indians.
It's as bad as Scientology or People's Temple.
We see people decrying the influence of social media, but I remember what the internet was like before 4chan blew up. Before 4chan, the white supremacists and neo-Nazis stayed on stormfront.org where they damn well belonged, and if they showed up elsewhere they were bullied until they left.
Now we're expected to "tolerate" these ignorant shitfountains because of "free speech" and "civility". "Rights for me, privileges for thee," being the central principle of reactionaries of all stripes.
> turned down a chance to move into an fight club house filled with Polish neo-nazis
If I had to choose between living with my parents and having a bunch of Polish neo-Nazis as roommates I'd have to sit down and think it over. Neither option is particularly palatable. The former means living with people who still see me as their "little boy" and can't accept that I've had a mind of my own for the last 30 years or so. The latter means being seen as a neo-Nazi myself because guilt by association is as human as wanting to murder somebody because they won't acknowledge that your god has a bigger dick than their god.
They don't all wear MAGA hats or brown shirts. That would be too convenient.
8Chan, and various darker corners of the internet have it much worse. The fact is, moderating this type of thing out of sight is counterproductive, and even downright dangerous.
People can't get pulled back from the edge if you can't find them, and you aren't saving any sinners if you never leave the church.
We don’t rob people then give them back their things to raise awareness about robbery.
I have a tough time seeing how this gets the point across
Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
This is the tyranny of angels -- or at least the tyranny of those who believe themselves on the side of the angels.
And would they also choose to bully everyone who's tall, in an anti-bullying campaign?
I'm sure I'd be uncomfortable, but probably not in a sexual-harassment sort of way, just in a "this stranger is a scary weirdo" way.
Maybe that's the intent? I dunno.