The real question is, what is considers an infringement? This is true of other rights as well. It's hard to define without trampling rights, especially for minority interests in a democracy.
The real question is, what is considers an infringement? This is true of other rights as well. It's hard to define without trampling rights, especially for minority interests in a democracy.
> The real question is, what is considered an infringement?
gee itd be great if that question was discussed in right-wing media instead of uncritically painting every attempt at discussion as a violation.
I don't just mean on this issue, but in general. We see vastly different controls on guns/abortion/voting/etc from state to state. When is a restriction an infringement? Who decides that and on what basis? It seems that it's up to judges, but what happens if none of the judges are members of the minority group who are being restricted (think segregation)? That's the part I find interesting.