The word "anarchists" fits in its purest sense of tossing the org chart. Yet its common meaning of "bomb thrower" hardly applies.
I typically describe Agile as "A small, stable cadre of ninjas getting it done."
Projects wind up with too much scope, a revolving-door staff, and a dearth of wizards to cut through the technical thicket.
The discussion of "tech debt vs. 'green field' projects" minimizes the threat of legacy code/data to any agile effort.
We need to talk about a "software archaeologist" specialty where one tries to plow through a mound of garbage left by the predecessors and seeks to figure out what prescriptions their therapists had written for them.