Suddenly startups are having trouble raising money. Why?
noahpinion.substack.com
noahpinion.substack.com
We have begun the transition from the part of the cycle with mania (where valuations assume virtually impossibly bright futures) to a more depressed view where estimates of the future are worse than the present, rather than absurdly better.
This destroys valuation for startups really, really fast.
The party is ending for the unicorn that has no strategy for ever becoming profitable, and those unicorns will probably roll up and die or get acquired on the cheap by companies that actually have business models.
This happens from time to time, and it's very healthy (though it feels really shitty to live through). You can see all around signs of the lavishness of the unicorn lifestyle, utterly detached from any notion of actual value created.
The party seems to have just ended. We'll see, the music always might start up again. But I wouldn't bet on it, and, apparently neither are VCs.
Whenever people worry about startups having trouble raising, I think they forget that most startups are trash. Now, fewer of the bad startups are going to get funding. The worthwhile startups will be fine, maybe even better with less noise in the landscape.
I imagine most of the startups that continue to thrive will be the ones that are well-funded by Tier 1 investors: https://topstartups.io/
The answer seems to be "gobs and gobs of them", and those companies have zero actual value.
Those companies might not fold if they're profitable, but their owners are going to get hurt.
I'd be more interested to see the numbers with that removed. Though of course maybe it's not as big as I think.
We'll see a concomitant expansion of startups that promise to save businesses time and money, trim waste, do more with less, etc.
Contrasting examples of the two categories: Startup that promises to enable you to respond to more RFPs faster, vs. startup that allows you to undercut competing bids.