Who do you reckon would cast the most votes?
Correct, SEO bots.
Correct, SEO bots.
Additionally, people writing bots learn just like Google learns, and start generating what appears to be legitimate interactions. Same algorithms that fit to critique between 'bot' and 'non-bot' class can be used to create bots that fall into the 'non-bot' category.
It's a losing battle - but what we get is better than we would get if they collected less data.
Quality Raters don’t actually rank websites.
Quality Raters look at websites and answer questions about them. Google then uses that data as a small part of their algorithm to adjust some factors about those sites.
Quality Raters don’t actually rank pages on google.
> Quality Raters look at websites and answer questions about them.
Wrong. I was never asked any questions beyond to rank to site quality for a query
> Quality Raters don’t actually rank website
Wrong again. This is what we did. We assessed website rankings for specific queries.
> Quality Raters look at websites and answer questions about them.
Wrong. At least in my case. I was never asked any questions beyond to rank to site quality for a query