In the Netherlands, many investors, big and small, are buying up houses to rent out. Airbnb renting was a part of this as well. Many local governments are now creating rules, like, you have to live in the house when you buy it. Also, some taxes for investors have increased a lot. What is happening in the last few months is that less investors have bought houses and more have been bought by people buying their first home. The sharp rise in prices has been more normalized.
Still, there is a shortage of housing and the low interest caused over-bidding by people in a rushed market. The result was that only investors and people which had financial support from their parents could buy houses. Of course somewhat to their own detriment with paying too much and having too big loans.
The government did tighten the rules a bit several years ago so that effectively (there are ways around it), you needed to be a resident to buy property, but I don't think that had that much impact (although maybe it would be even worse if that wasn't done?)
For some inexplicable reason they decided to remove the LVR requirements for lending in response to covid.
This suddenly caused a huge surge in ability for people to buy houses that were previously not able to.
Another 20% growth and PM wouldn’t be able to afford her house on $470k a year salary
It's crazy. Great to feel you have more equity on the surface, but it's meaningless really as you have to sell to buy if your moving and then things like rates and stamp duty are higher than ever.
I think the best solution is cap how many properties people can own. Homes are good for people or investors, not both. While interest rates are the main driver, a country like Australia has little ability to far steer outside global rates. From that I think the best solution is to place a limit of ~3 residential properties per person, or something like than with a grace period to ease the new rules. Get the big investors out of the market. Make homes for people again. Action should have been 15 years ago before it was todays problem, but was still obviously heading this way. It's going to be hard to unwind now without creating serious pain somewhere.
If you limit it to 3 houses per person you'll get people buying houses for their three year olds (which already happens). It's an improvement, for sure, but it'll be rorted.
What we really need is 1960s Chinese Land Reforms
That's easy enough to rule against, much like they do with income shifting to children.
> What we really need is 1960s Chinese Land Reforms
Not really into violence. Also where has it landed them 60 years later? The best is sensible structural rules for the long term.
See these banks for examples:
- https://www.kiwibank.co.nz/personal-banking/home-loans/
- https://www.asb.co.nz/home-loans-mortgages
- https://www.westpac.co.nz/home-loans-mortgages/
Also, it appears that our central bank has an interest rate of 1.5%: https://www.cnbc.com/2022/04/13/new-zealand-central-bank-hik....