That they're not alive humans, and those states that have higher maternal mortality and lower standards of care for children, also have stated that the wish to ban access to and coverage of birth control. That's something where abortion doesn't even come into it, it's purely about controlling women at that point.

I also feel sorry for those women who did try to do the right thing but nonetheless got pregnant, who will now be forced to take massive bills on because the states forcing them to give birth fail to provide the most basic care.

The before you get to the women who get pregnancy that puts the mother's life at risk, or who gets a cancer diagnosis and now can't get treated because it would cause an abortion, and of course the children raped by priests.

In terms of being "sexually irresponsible", the states that a pro-controlling-women generally provide at best inaccurate safe sex information. It's been well established in numerous countries at this point that stop abortion is achieved by comprehensive sex ed (which also cuts STDs/STIs, a variety of cancers, ..) and easy access to birth control.

But again, these states have all declared that they care mostly about forcing women to have babies, and not at all about reducing abortion.

Of course the changes these states are planning on will increase the number of people who die during abortions, increase the amount of poverty, and won't stop abortions among the rich in those states because they can always easily fly a neighboring state that respects women's rights.

While the conservative states still let women travel without chaperones of course.