How to Do Hard Things
every.to
every.to
Think about your core values and why you are doing what you are doing, and what you want to achieve. Make some values more important than others. Everything you do should be in support towards those values.
Personally I want to build cool things and organizations that didn’t exist before, and make enough money such that I can one-up and establish egoic superiority over my neighbors, friends, and family (who hardly know anything about what I’m doing). I’m willing to push through difficult things to make this happen. I don’t want to turn this comment into a brag-fest but already reached some mild/decent success so far which gives me a lot of satisfaction.
1) Look at the whole problem.
2) Split it up into smaller parts. As you do so, try to...
3) Evaluate each part on how a) basic to the rest of the problem or based on other parts it is, and b) how easy or hard it is to do.
4) Begin with the most basic parts; among those, begin with the easiest ones.
5) If some part turns out to be a big(gish) problem in itself, do the same splitting-up and ordering in steps 2-4 with it.
6) If at some point you find that you've made a mistake in your Step-3 evaluating, re-evaluate and re-order; then continue according to the new evaluation order.
Honestly, is there any other sensible way, and doesn't pretty much everyone know that already?
But yeah, this post was -- after the annoying advertisement formatted like actual content-- about something else: How to get started in the first place. Oh well, insert as Step 0?
The section on values was the most helpful to me personally.
Take Newton’s ideas about gravity and the motion of bodies for example. The day before Einstein came up with general relativity, Newton’s ideas had the most possible data which confirmed they were true. In other words, they were as wrong as they ever had been.
Relativity predicted the warping of spacetime, which was shown to be real in a single experiment. It’s not like more data is needed to make it more true.
Back to the original topic: If this ACT stuff is a good explanation for your behavior, and if it works for you, what more data is needed?
> If this ACT stuff is a good explanation for your behavior, and if it works for you, what more data is needed?
I’m wrong like all the time, so I only lean on my own judgement about explanations so much. And how would I really know something is working for me? Sometimes there are confounds and there are definitely measurement errors.
As to any particular implementation, that's a different issue.
https://www.karger.com/Article/Abstract/365764
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016503271...
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000579671...