Oral administration of NMN is safe and efficiently increases blood NAD levels
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The stuff I got was from Alive By Science, now Renue, and they claim theirs is shelf stable. https://renuebyscience.com/how-long-does-our-nmn-retain-its-...
I believe safety at these levels is irrevelant, so I prefer just working out every day and limiting my sugar and alcohol intake, all of which have proven life extension effects.
While it does not itself cause cancer, it accelerates cancer growth and thus can make catching it early less likely.
Also, the mechanism may be more complicated. What if NAD+ levels influence the immune system somehow? (Our first line defence against cancer.) Metabolism isn't a straightforward (A -> B) system at all.
>YU, YF, TaS, and ToS were employees of Mitsubishi Corporation Life Sciences Limited and prepared NMN and the placebo
I assume the FDA is the final arbiter of what's safe and what isn't, but do they have a position? Or is this in the nebulous world of vitamin and mineral supplements that they don't regulate?
I started taking niacin before doing push-ups when I read that it cause a 3 to 6 fold increase in growth hormone during exercise.[3]
1- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2779993/
2- same article page 14 to 15
3‐ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7564973/
edit: formatting
Quoted from https://www.nmn.com/precursors/what-is-nad
"NAD+ works as a shuttle bus, transferring electrons from one molecule to another within cells to carry out all sorts of reactions and processes. With its molecular counterpart, NADH, this vital molecule participates in various metabolic reactions that generate our cell’s energy."
Very few people know it but there exist a ~direct opposite to ALCAR: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meldonium#Physio-pharmacology This drug decrease beta-oxidation and increase the ratio of glucose consumption. As you can see e.g. on the wikipedia page, the rethoric behind mildronate sounds too very positive except many of the statements pro ALCAR/Mildronate are contradictory, in direct opposition. So either there is an explanatory factor that resolve the contradictions, either one or the other do actually significant harm, despite both having backing scientific evidence of improving health. This topic is major since those are the most potent mechanics toward mitochondria bioenergetics regulation, which is a major way to improve your lifespan/healthspan and even cognition.
The issue is that the quality of the dicussion/research needed to elucidate those issues is above the level found on online forums and no paper directly address the question, so I am stuck in uncertainty.
BTW I recently discovered the organelle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peroxisome which is actually important in lipid (and therefore glucose) and oxidative metabolism
effect of ALCAR on brain-glucose: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22549035/