I can't imagine everyone thinks this is 100% perfect though, so please let me know what you'd like me to improve! None of this is set in stone, I really do appreciate all kinds of feedback. Thanks!
I can't imagine everyone thinks this is 100% perfect though, so please let me know what you'd like me to improve! None of this is set in stone, I really do appreciate all kinds of feedback. Thanks!
How good is my Python out of 5? In what areas? Compared to who, someone with 30 years of Python experience or my peers who've never coded before?
Furthermore, with natural languages, there are commonly used scores (CEFR in Europe at least) that are more or less objective and don't depend person to person. If someone says they're B1, you know what to expect. If someone says they're 3/5, what does that mean?
I would like the option to not justify how skilled I am at something, or have more flexibility to qualify/quantify my skills such as, but not limited to, number of years of professional use.
I agree 100%, I'll think of a good indicator to add some some kind of standard there. Otherwise it's probably going to end up with CVs that all only have 5/5 stars, making the whole grading thing worthless.