There are a great many things I don’t always agree with the majority on, but in the face of a determined majority, I often lose. That’s a part of living in a democracy, and I can take solace in not always losing. I don’t support majoritarianism either, if we ever reformulate the Senate for any reason, I hope we still end up with an anti-majoritarian institution of some sort and I even have some ideas on how to both accomplish that and make it more representative if you’re interested.
That said, political offices are inherently about power. They are offices of power, not fairness; people who seek to be elected to office are people who seek acquire power; and the Constitution we have, including the one that you think we should have is fundamentally a power sharing agreement between people and States. Without the rule of law, we don’t have a nation, nor do we have the institutions we rely on to protect us from injustices both foreign or domestic.
Abortion was never not political. SCOTUS cannot bang their gavels and make it not political because society has politicized this issue under Roe/Casey’s jurisprudence and will continue to politicize it even if Roe/Casey are actually overturned. You could not successfully pass a constitutional amendment, declare victory, and expect the political nature of it to evaporate. There is no “should” here, there is only the reality that we live in with the people we share it with whether we recognize it as such or not.
More than abortion, I think the biggest problem we have as a nation is a lack of buy-in, or put another way: representation. We have more or less the right framework for government, but the most powerful branch of government is Congress and Congress itself is both too under-representative and too disinterested, and specifically the House of Representatives for which it is their entire schtick to be the directly elected house most representative of Americans. If you wanted to pass a Constitutional amendment of some sort, I would think about how to improve the legislature, because it doesn’t matter how many “rights” you stack in there if Americans do not culturally respect them. So how do you get the buy-in so we can have actual conversations about divisive political issues which divide us (instead of SCOTUS kindly putting the legislative conversation on hold for 50 or so years, elected representatives have more or less been able to say whatever they want without facing actual electoral consequences) and broker actual compromises?