Do you feel the same protection of personal autonomy extends to vaccine mandates as well?
because the two issues are not even remotely linked.
You get vaccinated for the community, it's a "bigger than you" problem, it's for "the greater good".
Women that want to get an abortion most of the time didn't want the baby they are carrying, they were forced to.
So it's reversed: if someone forced you to get COVID using violence but the supreme court blocked you from getting the vaccine, it would be right to scream "my body my choice".
Clearer now?
I'm not sure I get the argument either. Is the danger that God grabs his ban hammer and stomps western society because a woman living as part of that society decided to end a pregnancy?
Fwiw: I was against a vaccination requirement for COVID-19, but categorically denying that it might be necessary for another virus is a very dangerous worldview. It's not necessarily a choice an individual can do, because herd immunity is a thing and vaccinations usually don't make you immune to a virus, it usually just improves the odds your immune system has against it.
They think you and the world will be better for it. Its certainly not my argument
>Is the danger that God grabs his ban hammer and stomps western society because a woman living as part of that society decided to end a pregnancy?
Being scared of the ban hammer is history for the last 300 years of Catholicism.