This doesn't mean anyone who is extroverted can't be a good listener, regardless of how you define it, but it does suggest that whatever this pattern is in the paper, it's the thing that matters most?
This doesn't mean anyone who is extroverted can't be a good listener, regardless of how you define it, but it does suggest that whatever this pattern is in the paper, it's the thing that matters most?
So I agree with you in the sense that merely letting the other person speak and giving them enough attention to appear like you're listening is still putting their interests first. Though, if you're already there, why not actually listen? Or if you really don't want to listen, sounds like not a great relationship...
If you don't lord it over them you can generally get away with being pretty blunt. Judge but give no consequence otherwise. Like, you were definitely the assole here or wrong to do that but I feel ya.
It's even OK with me to switch from the first strategy to the second mid-conversation if the situation changes, with something like "Sorry, I was on autopilot for a minute. I think I'm following now."
Obviously no one expects perfect recall, especially of conversations from some time ago. But active listening and remembering are important in building up an accurate picture of the other person, and deep mirroring relies on deep and useful insight.
It's a completely different kind of interaction to superficial nodding and mirroring.