Abu Dhabi Traffic Accidents Dropped 40% During the BlackBerry Outage
theatlanticwire.com
theatlanticwire.com
"Two weeks ago, Abu Dhabi Police announced a campaign against motorists who use their phones while at the wheel." ... "Gen Tamim likewise warned that Dubai Police will soon be using electronic evidence against drivers who cause accidents while using their smart devices." ... "The precise statistics for traffic accidents in the two emirates this week were not revealed to The National."
The story shares a lot with the alleged Blackout Baby Boom, which turned out to be utter bollocks: http://www.snopes.com/pregnant/blackout.asp
It's a serious factor in my desire to move somewhere where I don't need a car to get around.
[EDIT] Plus people walking and texting in the city can be just as bad when driving in Chicago when they walk out into an intersection without looking.
Maybe I should just plough through them, and then sue for damage to my car.
In any case, you're right, it's possible for them to pose a danger, but it's still much less than that posed by drivers.
Makes me afraid to use the bicycle lane anymore.
I sure hope police/insurance companies are looking at cellphone records after accidents to fine people appropriately for this kind of behavior.
My town has bike lanes, why shouldn't I be able to use them?
Unfortunately they are not the kind of bike lanes with the "wake up" bump strip between the car and bike.
I also walk on sidewalks instead of a treadmill in a gym. Seems more practical and purposeful to me.
If using a cellphone while driving is proven to be almost as bad as being drunk - why isn't it as illegal nationwide?
When I was a student there were over 100 cycles in common use, and in the 4 years I was there there was only one broken leg from a cycle accident.
While that is a tiny sample, that certainly looks like a lot lower than you predict.
People coming from, say, the netherlands just don't realise how dangerous it is to ride bikes on roads in non-biking countries (uk, us, etc.). Car drivers just don't bother looking or just don't care. "King of the road" mentality.
I live in Victoria, BC and there are bikes on the road all the time here. A good portion of the roads have bike lanes and people are used to driving motor vehicles in tandem with bikes on the road.
For all you know he does live in the Netherlands. Maybe even on Vlieland (ok I know this is extremely unlikely, but we don't know).
Get this book and read it: http://www.amazon.com/Effective-Cycling-6th-John-Forester/dp...
Where do you live that this is true?
Like anything, riding in traffic involves learning and practice. Read "Effective Cycling" to learn the rules and techniques, then try it out. 10,000 hours later (according to Gladwell), you'll be a pro. (I'm don't have this much practice, but I still feel safe. I can only think of two dumb mistakes I've made, and I recovered from them without disrupting traffic flow or being injured.)
A few techniques that I learned experimentally:
1) Don't filter forward unless there is a lane that you can use. Cyclists seem to want to get to that line when the light is red, but they never think about where they're going to go when the light changes. I wait behind the cars in the middle of the lane and never have trouble merging into the flow of traffic. (The cyclists that filter forward are faced with two possibilities. Stand around like an idiot while all the waiting traffic passes you and you can safely merge back into traffic, or run the light when the other direction gets their yellow, cutting in front of the waiting cars. Both confuse and annoy other users of the road, and the second one is illegal and dangerous. Drive your bike like a car.)
2) Most rightmost straight-through lanes are, in practice, right turn lanes, so stay out of them. If you don't, you just annoy people that want the opportunity to turn right on red. After the light changes, nobody will pass you on the right because the lane is blocked with right-turning cars waiting for pedestrians, and so you have a clear lane as soon as you get into the intersection. Failing that, nobody will pass you on the right because vehicles simply do not overtake slow-moving vehicles on the right. Verify this with a look backwards and a polite wave.
3) Cyclists never obey stop signs, so drivers are very confused when you are stopped at one. A hand signal to the person with the right-of-way is appropriate to restore the correct flow at the intersection.
Do you have anything to back that statement up with? Sounds like FUD to me.
This part: the negatives are pollution/lung issues
This part: reasonably high likelihood of injury or death
And this part: compared to other forms of transport
From your latest comment, this part: seems commonsense that bike riding would be more dangerous than car driving
And this part: simple physics
And also in the context of: not everything needs a dataset when simple physics would suffice
That would cover it for now.
Where I live now, the air is great, but there are few if any bike lanes. Yet, I still see cyclists going down 2 lane roads with traffic going by them at 50MPH. An accident is bound to happen, and over the summer a cyclist was hit on one of the bridges. He flew off the bridge, and fell to his death. It is common sense that cycling on busy roads is more dangerous than driving a car on the same road.
Here in the UK, around 90% of road traffic accidents are attributable to driver error.
We badly need to reach the era of self-driving cars, so that folks who'd rather be checking their email can do so without endangering the rest of us, and so that cyclists can ride the highways safely again (or at least as safely as they did prior to 1910 or thereabouts).
Americans are taught at an early age to be afraid of riding their bikes on the street, but there is really nothing scary about it. And drivers aren't as bad as you think they are: when there is something in their path, they tend to steer around it.
Even if there is an increased contact with pollutants, which is debatable, it's not certain that this causes any adverse health effects. Evidence also suggests that the health you gain from regular physical activity offsets any potential damage from breathing pollutants. Most people die of heart disease long before they get the cancer that the pollutants supposedly cause.
You will die one day even if you live in a cleanroom. Why not get some exercise before you do?
But at least you showed it's possible, that's something!
* When in a train/bus/car
* When I need directions
* When I feel like a game of chess
Further to this, my smartphone is also useful for: * It's alarm clock
* Looking up facts over discussions away from home/office
I noticed my need for a smartphone dropped dramatically when I stopped commuting. I don't have push email (on purpose) and so I don't check email every time it beeps. After a month of this, I lost the automatic urge to check email.I would do without a smartphone except for the maps function. I could buy a dedicated GPS, but the additional features, having web access anywhere, chess (trivial), alarm, push the smartphone ahead.
Get rid of your car, don't live in a sprawling city, walk places: problem solved.
http://www.thenational.ae/news/uae-news/blackberry-cuts-made...