Hacker News Reader

Amazon's desire to sell a device for less than it costs to make is not our problem. Computational disenfranchisement is wrong, and technical measures to create disenfranchisement should be considered contrary to the public good the same way as many other abusive relationships are.

Why should we be fair to Amazon? I consistently read on this site about how bad they are as an employer, company, and a web store.

And then you went and bought their product?

I think it’s fair to complain about a company whose product you bought. I have both android phones and iphones and complain about the parent companies all the time. Same thing with Nike, P&G, J&J, and a handful of the other oversized American conglomerates.

We shouldn't. And ethical problems aside, a bad product is a bad product.

> and a web store

Weird. On of the reasons I use a kindle is how the web store is better and has more content and sales than alternatives like Indigo (who sells Kobo)

Doesn’t Amazon make money on every single book purchased on the kindle?

I mean Amazon's model for the kindle is the equivalent of the maxim, "give away the razors so you can sell the blades".