Y Combinator Company Terminates Whistleblower for Raising Voice
linkedin.com
linkedin.com
Some whistleblowers are right and valuable, other just attention grabbers or liars. Each case should be examined one by one before start burning down the company. The article explains really few about the content, and this is what really matters, not that somebody would self-tag as whistleblower (hence in possession of the absolute truth?).
Employees of company "X" tagging publicly "X" as evil will crash easily against defamation laws, and the right to not being defamed is regulated by law, while free speech has some exceptions. By Pete's sake, If you think that you discovered a real crime go to the police or to a union, not to fakenewsland. Venting his frustration on internet instead is stupid.
No true:
>>The wrongdoing you disclose must be in the public interest. This means it must affect others, for example the general public.
>>As a whistleblower you’re protected by law - you should not be treated unfairly or lose your job because you ‘blow the whistle’.
He seems to be knocking at all the wrong doors, and he should know better, as it seems that is the second company that let him go by the same behavior.