>I get that this story may be apocryphal, but if so it is surely widely disseminated by now. I even wondered about factuality as I wrote my comment, yet I knew of no evidence to the contrary.

You'd be hard pressed to provide a search pattern in any search engine that would provide a top 5 result that isn't about Ford wage raises in 1914 being about anything else than worker retention.

> You didn't provide any substantial counterpoint. So what was the point you were making?

Nor did you provide any substantial point. What is it with double standards today? My point was that you are spreading falsehoods.